8 Slices
Medium 9781855754492

CHAPTER SIX: Towards a Further Integration of Interdividual Psychology and Dialogical Consciousness via Developmental Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Linguistics

Rachel Pollard Karnac Books ePub

In the last chapter I discussed in greater detail how Girard's interdividual psychology could contribute to dialogical self theory, while acknowledging that a theory of desire on its own is not a sufficient or adequate basis on which to construct a model of human functioning that could usefully inform psychotherapy. I further argued that while the dialogical model and the interdividual model are complementary accounts that together have the potential for a greater understanding of human functioning and that although both are necessary, neither on their own nor in combination are sufficient. The linguistic turn in psychotherapy that conceives of the self as dialogical is reductive in that it offers a structural analysis of consciousness without adequately accounting for desire or motivation. The scope of interdividual psychology encompasses an apparently exhaustive range of human behaviour and subjective experience but is still inadequate in either accounting for or describing those aspects of human behaviour that are not governed by imitation, rivalry and, competition. In largely confining themselves to the symbolic realm of experience, both models could be said to perpetuate dualistic ways of thinking in that they do not take enough account of the fact all that human experience is embodied experience and therefore of human physiology.

See All Chapters
Medium 9781855754492

CHAPTER THREE: Bakhtin, the Dialogical Self and Dialogical Psychotherapy

Rachel Pollard Karnac Books ePub

Just as interest in critical theory in North America created the conditions necessary for the reception of Bakhtin in literary studies (Wachtel, 2000), the development of a psychology of the “self”, inspired by James Mead, both coincided with Bakhtin's dialogic conception of consciousness (Hermans, 2004) and paved the way for what has come to be known as the “Dialogical Self”. The first part of this chapter will give a brief overview of the “Dialogical Self” and the importance of Bakhtin's analysis of linguistic style in the modern novel in his interpretation of dialogism. The second part of the chapter examines some of the ways in which dialogical concepts derived from Bakhtin have been used in conjunction with two different models of psychotherapy; the third part compares dialogical approaches with other linguistic approaches to psychotherapy.

In psychotherapy, Bakhtin has become associated with a concept of the self that is “dialogical” i.e. that consists of a number of different “voices” that speak to each other from different “positions” or points of view (Stiles, 1997, Hermans 1996, 2004). These voices may have a historical origin, for example the voice of a parent, or they could have a more general, societal origin such as social class or social expectations of women or men, or be the voices of groups in society that we belong to such as a political party, football club or a religious faith. William Stiles (1997) suggests that the concept of “voice” can be understood as akin to that of role, in a sociological sense, or as that of object, in the psychoanalytic sense, or even, from a Jungian perspective, as an archetype:

See All Chapters
Medium 9781855754492

CHAPTER EIGHT: Towards a Bakhtinian Practice of Psychotherapy

Rachel Pollard Karnac Books ePub

… the embodiment of meaning in mortal flesh—is born and dies in the world and for the world; it is totally given in the world and can be consummated in the world … As such … it can be a hero. [Bakhtin, 1990, p. 111]

In this concluding chapter I will discuss how a more inclusive reading of Bakhtin, together with a qualified reading of Girard, could contribute towards finding a direction for a practice of psychotherapy inspired by Bakhtinian ethics. The dialogical aspects of Bakhtin have already been widely used to inform theory and practice in psychotherapy as discussed in Chapter Three. In this chapter I will focus on the other aspects of Bakhtin's thinking that I think are the contextual background in which the dialogical should be understood.

As previously discussed, there are many conflicting interpretations of Bakhtin and therefore when using his concepts in psychotherapy there is a need to be explicit about our own chosen interpretation. It is first necessary to return to the difficulties posed about the use of Bakhtin in psychotherapy theory and practice discussed in Chapter One. Two main questions emerged: given the uncertainty about the meaning of Bakhtin's most important concepts, how can psychotherapists justify the use of one meaning over any other? If there is an overall coherence to Bakhtin's works, can psychotherapists selectively appropriate particular concepts without distortion by removal from their wider context?

See All Chapters
Medium 9781855754492

CHAPTER TWO: Bakhtin, Dialogism, and European Philosophy

Rachel Pollard Karnac Books ePub

The previous chapter introduced the field of Bakhtin studies, drawing particular attention to the potential problems of interpreting Bakhtinian ideas for the practice of psychotherapy. This chapter discusses dialogism, the Bakhtinian concept that has been most influential in psychotherapy theory. This necessitates some exploration of the many meanings that have been attributed to dialogism as well as the overall context in which Bakhtin developed his ideas. Bakhtin did not write in isolation but in dialogue with other thinkers as others have subsequently written in dialogue with him, so some acknowledgement is needed of Bakhtin's relationship with European philosophy in order to contextualise his thinking. As Hirschkop (1999) wrote, interpretations that put Bakhtin into solitary confinement (136) are both inaccurate and an oversimplification of his writing. Far from being a thinker in isolation, Bakhtin was swimming with some of the dominant philosophical currents of his time.

Although a classicist by training, Bakhtin and others of his generation wrote and studied under the reigning influence of Kant and is now considered by most scholars1 to have been a fellow traveller with the diffuse but highly influential philosophical movement known as the neo-Kantians. Bakhtin's dialogism originates in his dialogue with Kant and is best understood, in this context, as a philosophical idea about nature of meaning rather than as a linguistic concept. An important aspect of Kant's influence on Bakhtin is Kant's concern with our relationship with the world, which led to Bakhtin's profound interest in how we interpret the world and our experience in it (Holquist, 1990). The second half of the 19th century saw a “return to Kant” in German philosophy in an attempt to recover a unity between philosophy, the natural sciences, and culture and as a reaction against individualism and psychologism.2Anyone struggling to relate Bakhtin's early works, with their concerns with aesthetics, authoring, and creative activity, to psychotherapy should bear in mind that the early Bakhtin was trying to overcome the separation of art from life and culture from science in an attempt to recover a unity of experience and being. Psychology, like the other human sciences, only emerged as a separate discipline with its own body of knowledge in the early 19th century, largely divorced from its parent discipline of philosophy. Since Freud, psychotherapy has traditionally been much more catholic in its knowledge base but, to the extent that it has relied on psychological theories, this has constrained its effectiveness in understanding and finding solutions to human problems and has led to a certain degree of introverted navel-gazing among its practitioners. In his emphasis on human difference and the uniqueness of each human being, Bakhtin exposes some of the limitations of approaching any encounter with another individual with preconceptions.

See All Chapters
Medium 9781855754492

CHAPTER ONE: Who was Mikhail Bakhtin?

Rachel Pollard Karnac Books ePub

Although little known during his lifetime, since his death in 1975 this Russian philosopher and cultural theorist has achieved immense popularity among academics in the West as his influence has extended beyond literary criticism and philosophy across the humanities and even further to psychotherapy. In stark contrast to Bakhtin's penury and relative domestic obscurity, his ideas have become the springboard for many notable Western academic careers. Scholars from diverse perspectives, from Marxists to theologians, from feminists to postcolonial theorists, from sociologists to linguists, and literary theorists to psychologists, have all declared an interest in Bakhtin. As Graham Pechey (1989) observed, one of the interesting characteristics of Bakhtin's ideas is their capacity to migrate across national and disciplinary boundaries and make themselves at home in very different fields of intellectual endeavour. However, Edward Said (2001) warns that when theories travel beyond their original and temporal context, they can lose some of their radical power. One of the central arguments of this book is that the Bakhtin invoked in psychotherapy is a much tamer and less controversial figure than the Russian Bakhtin and that the radical implications of his thinking for psychotherapy extend far beyond the notion of the “Dialogical Self”. Moreover, outside the field of psychotherapy, Bakhtin's thinking is highly contested, making any unitary or monologic interpretation problematic.

See All Chapters

See All Slices